Economic convergence—the idea that poorer economies should grow faster than richer ones and eventually catch up—is one of the most consequential predictions in economics. Its validity determines whether global inequality is a permanent feature or a transitional phase.
The logic is intuitive: poor countries have less capital per worker, so each additional unit of investment should yield higher returns. They can adopt technologies already developed elsewhere rather than inventing from scratch. Workers moving from subsistence agriculture to modern sectors generate immediate productivity gains.
Yet the empirical record is mixed. Some economies have achieved spectacular catch-up growth—South Korea, Taiwan, China, and more recently Vietnam and Bangladesh. Others have stagnated for decades or even fallen further behind. Understanding why convergence happens in some contexts but not others is central to development economics and global policy.
"The consequences for human welfare involved in questions like these are simply staggering: Once one starts to think about them, it is hard to think about anything else."
— Robert Lucas, Nobel Laureate, on economic growth